The patriotic communist

For a long time.. approximately slightly over sixty years.. Indians have not known what is good for them.

Thank god we have our Communists brothers to correct our moral compasses when we are so ignorant about India's national interest.

As Mr. Raja, of the Left, articulated so well to a television journalist that since the Communists were part of the freedom movement and always put the country's interests first, we should trust them on their opposition of the Nuclear deal.

It was presumably from wonderful ideological viewpoint that the Left opposed the Quit India movement and pronounced confidently that India will disintegrate in 1948. After all, it is a hallmark of Marxism to decry a State as the tool for the rich to rule the poor. This was Marx's principal difference with Hegel who believed that the State was there to keep harmony amongst various interest groups. AND that is all i know about marx and hegel. oh also that marx had a bushy beard.

Subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh would be ashamed at their lack of patriotism as compared to the position of the doyen of Indian communism Namboodripad (or however you spell his name) who took the stand that India was the aggressor against China in the Indo-China war. We must thank the Left for their support of the country during war time.

Let the record show that it was the the Left who opposed the entry of computers when Rajiv Gandhi wanted India to invest in IT. It was they who knew that Orkut would destroy India twenty years ago. We didnt listen to them and look at the destruction that computers have wrecked in our country.

Communism is firmly opposed to democracy. It is only in India that we find communists standing part of mainstream politics a tribute to the fact that this country can Indianize and making anything work.

The true face of communism could be seen in the persecution of ideological opponents in cuba, china and russia. A lot of dope smokers eulogize Che Guevera. For all his admirable idealism the sad truth is the man was raving mad. Not only did he smoke cigars even though he was a chronic asthmatic, he wanted a nuclear war between the Soviets and the United States and looked at Kuruchev's backing down during the Cuban missile crisis a betrayal.

A lot of people believe that there is something inherently wrong with islam because of which it is a global terrorist threat. while i do believe that islam poses serious threats to freedom of expression as it is extremely hostile to criticism of its prophet (this is a difficult to say categorically after Hindus have put bounties on M.F. Hussains head and called for his beheading) a lot of people overlook the role of the CIA in creating this terror machinery.

The interesting thing and why i raise this point in the discussion on communism is that it was the United States of America that armed Osama bin Laden, the Taliban and the Pakistani Army the primary drivers of terrorism today) in order to contain Communism. They also armed Saddam Hussain but that was more of an energy security scheme. The CIA sold weapons to Iran (while they were holding over a hundered American hostages) to fund wars in South America against communists.

Post the end of the cold war it this war machinery trained carefully by the CIA which has turned the tables on them. So now communists and islamic hardliners find themselves on the same side.

It is my belief that by arming islamic extremists america has made it more hard for liberal values to take hold amongst muslims. Furthermore, by supporting israel and having a looming presence to secure oil, they have further hardened the people. Flowers do not bloom in shadows.

In India, one of the most important vote banks for communists are muslims. because of the fact that marx thought that 'man needs religion like a fish needs a bicycle', communists treat muslims like their personal cycles on which they ride to power. As the Sachar Committee Report points out, muslims are most backward in communist rules areas.

since i referred to a lot of conspiracy facts (not theories as the above mentioned things are well documented) but i feel a little crazy writing about them i want to talk about my crazy conspiracy theories.

i believe that there is a wide shared conspiracy to keep vote bank politics alive by driving a wedge between muslims and hindus in india. but the communist conspiracy goes further and is much more sinister.

the communists need india to be poor and backward because their primary vote banks are the poor and the backward. if poverty is eradicated in india the share of seats in parliament of the left will go from 50 to 5. i can bet anything on this.

why i feel that this conspiracy is more dastardly is because death during communal riots is instant.. the mob comes and burns you or chokes you with a tire or something... however suffering from the indignity of poverty and dying a slow death of starvation is much worse. i would prefer the former to the latter.

is this funny anymore? I cant tell..

so communists will carry anti-americanism and their stupid ideas to the point where it will hurt india.

but let us not forget.. they have the nation's best interests at heart.